Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
indiana

Search results

  1. Paul JONES, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe, et al. v. Dewey HEALING, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, et al. HEALING, Chairman of...al. v. JONES, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe, et al.

    Navajo Indian Tribe, et al. v. Dewey HEALING, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, et al. ... HEALING, Chairman of Hopi Tribal Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, et al. v. JONES, Chairman of Navajo Tribal ... Council of Navajo Indian Tribe, et al. Nos. 985 and 1050. Decided: June 3, 1963 per_curiam, per_curiam ...

  2. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al.

    420 U.S. 395 (95 S.Ct. 1066, 43 L.Ed.2d 279) CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al., Petitioners, v. ... INDIANS et al. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al. Nos. 73—1380, ... Company and others. Joseph J. Brecher, Boulder, Colo., for the Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians and others. TOP ...

  3. The TEE-HIT-TON INDIANS, An Identifiable Group of Alaska Indians, Petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES.

    348 U.S. 272 (75 S.Ct. 313, 99 L.Ed. 314) The TEE-HIT-TON INDIANS, An Identifiable Group of Alaska ... Indians, Petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES. No. 43. Argued: Nov. 12, 1954. Decided: Feb. 7, 1955. opinion, ... petitioner, an identifiable group of American Indians of between 60 and 70 individuals residing in Alaska, for ...

  4. COUNTY OF YAKIMA, et al., Petitioners, v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF YAKIMA and Dale A. Gray, Yakima County Treasurer.

    CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN ... which these taxes were past due, including certain fee-patented lands held by the Yakima Indian Nation ... Confederated Yakima Indian Nation, 492 U.S. 408, 431, 109 S.Ct. 2994, 3008, 106 L.Ed.2d 343 (opinion of WHITE, ...

  5. CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA v. UNITED STATES (RED LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA, Interveners).

    301 U.S. 358 (57 S.Ct. 826, 81 L.Ed. 1156) CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA v. UNITED STATES (RED ... LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA, Interveners).* No. 228. Argued: Feb. 2, 1937. Decided: May ... Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota. TOP Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the ...

  6. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION. POWER AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION.

    INDIAN NATION. POWER AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION. Nos. 63, 66. ... fee simply by the Tuscarora Indian Nation and lying adjacent to a natural power site on the Niagara ... interested parties, including the Tuscarora Indian Nation, inasmuch as the application contemplated the ...

  7. UNITED STATES,, v. CHOCTAW NATION and Chickasaw Nation. WICHITA and Affiliated Bands of Indians,, v. CHOCTAW NATION, Chickasaw Nation, and United States. CHOCTAW NATION...Nation,, v. UNITED STATES and Wichita and Affiliated Bands of Indians.

    Nation. WICHITA and Affiliated Bands of Indians, Appts., v. CHOCTAW NATION, Chickasaw Nation, and United ... Indians. Nos. 88, 89, 90. Argued: March 7, 8, 9, 1900. Decided: December 10, 1900. opinion, Harlan [HTML] ... Vale, and Wm. C. Shelley for Wichita and Affiliated Bands of Indians. 496 Mr. C. C. Binney, Attorney ...

  8. UNITED STATES v. OMAHA TRIBE OF INDIANS. OMAHA TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES.

    253 U.S. 275 (40 S.Ct. 522, 64 L.Ed. 901) UNITED STATES v. OMAHA TRIBE OF INDIANS. OMAHA TRIBE OF ... INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 243, 244. Argued: March 18, 1920. Decided: June 1, 1920. opinion, PITNEY ... [HTML] Mr. Charles H. Marillat, of Washington, D. C., for Omaha Tribe of indians. Mr. Assistant Attorney ...

  9. COUNTY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK, et al., Petitioners v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE, etc., et al. NEW YORK, Petitioner v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE, etc., et al.

    ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE, etc., et al. NEW YORK, Petitioner v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW ... Indian Tribes (hereafter respondents) brought an action in Federal District Court against petitioner ... that no person or entity could purchase Indian land without the Federal Government's ...

  10. Roy Tibbals WILSON et al., Petitioners, v. OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE et al. State of IOWA et al., Petitioners, v. OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE et al.

    INDIAN TRIBE et al. State of IOWA et al., Petitioners, v. OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE et al. Nos. 78-160, 78-161. ... Syllabus Pursuant to an 1854 treaty, the reservation of the Omaha Indian Tribe (Tribe) was established in ... reservation. Residents of Iowa ultimately settled on and improved this land, and these non-Indian owners and ...

Pages