Source
(Pub. L. 93–618, title I, § 182, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title I, § 1303(b), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1179; amended Pub. L. 103–182, title V, § 513, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2156; Pub. L. 103–465, title III, § 313, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4938; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(8)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–584.)
Amendments
1999—Subsec. (b)(2)(A).
Pub. L. 106–113 substituted “Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office” for “Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks”.
1994—Subsec. (b)(4).
Pub. L. 103–465, § 313(1), added par. (4).
Subsec. (d)(3).
Pub. L. 103–465, § 313(2)(A), amended introductory provisions generally. Prior to amendment, introductory provisions read as follows: “A foreign country denies fair and equitable market access if the foreign country effectively denies access to a market for a product protected by a copyright, patent, or process patent through the use of laws, procedures, practices, or regulations which—”.
Subsec. (d)(4).
Pub. L. 103–465, § 313(2)(B), added par. (4).
Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 103–465, § 313(3), added subsec. (g).
1993—Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 103–182 added subsec. (f).
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section
1000
(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of
Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section
1 of Title
35, Patents.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 103–465 effective on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], see section 316 of
Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section
3581 of this title.
Effective Date of 1993 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1994], see section 516(a) of
Pub. L. 103–182, set out as an Effective Date note under section
3461 of this title.
Procurement From Countries That Deny Adequate and Effective Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, § 852, Nov. 29, 1989,
103 Stat. 1517, as amended by
Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1302(a), Nov. 5, 1990,
104 Stat. 1668, provided that it is the sense of Congress that it be a very important consideration in procurement of property, services, or technology by the Department of Defense whether such procurement is from any person of any country which has been identified by the United States Trade Representative as denying adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or fair and equitable market access to United States persons that rely upon intellectual property protection.
Identification of Countries That Deny Adequate and Effective Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
Section 1303(a) of
Pub. L. 100–418 provided that:
“(1) The Congress finds that—
“(A) international protection of intellectual property rights is vital to the international competitiveness of United States persons that rely on protection of intellectual property rights; and
“(B) the absence of adequate and effective protection of United States intellectual property rights, and the denial of fair and equitable market access, seriously impede the ability of the United States persons that rely on protection of intellectual property rights to export and operate overseas, thereby harming the economic interests of the United States.
“(2) The purpose of this section [enacting this section and this note] is to provide for the development of an overall strategy to ensure adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights and fair and equitable market access for United States persons that rely on protection of intellectual property rights.”