ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC. (96-568)
83 F.3d 118, reversed and remanded.
Syllabus
Opinion
[ Scalia ]		Concurrence
[ Thomas ]
HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version

Thomas, J., concurring

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 96—568

JOSEPH ONCALE, PETITIONER v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

[March 4, 1998]

Justice Thomas, concurring.

I concur because the Court stresses that in every sexual harassment case, the plaintiff must plead and ultimately prove Title VII’s statutory requirement that there be discrimination “because of . . . sex.”